Clinical and Demographic Features of Burn Patients in Rasht
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52547/uiemj.1.2.60Keywords:
Burn, Mortality, Burn injuryAbstract
Background: Introduction: Burn is the fourth cause of trauma worldwide and as a major health challenge, it is one of the most common health-related accidents in different societies. This study aimed at risk of mortality assessment, based on the presentations at the emergency department.
Method: This was a retrospective analysis of burn patients admitted to Velayat Burn Hospital of Rasht, Iran, from March 2019 till 2020, regarding the possible factors affecting mortality. Eligible records were collected for data extraction of demographics, causes of burn, clinical examinations, paramedical findings, and hospitalization courses.
Results: Totally, 557 records of burning subjects (231 females and 326 males; mean age of 31±4.6 years) were included. The most common cause of burn was fire flame (49.4%). The most common area of the burn was the upper limp (59.5%). Totally, 47 (8.43%) were expired and 510 (91.75%) were rescued. The average body surface area affected by burn was 23.41±19.17%. Most of the patients (45.8%) were hospitalized for 5 to 10 days. The most common cause of death in patients was a septic shock (45%). Inhalation burn injury was seen in 40 patients (7.2%) and self-immolation happened in 23 (4.12%) patients. Mental disorders were statistically related to self-immolation, based on the fisher exact test (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The data summarized in this report provides the epidemiologic and clinical image of the burn injuries in Rasht city.
Declarations:
Funding:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
We do have not any relationships or support which might be perceived as constituting a conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement:
We would like to thank the staff of the medical records department of the Velayat Burns Hospital of Rasht for their sincere efforts and cooperation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full Text
Introduction
Burn is the fourth cause of trauma worldwide and a major health challenge (1-3), it is one of the most common health-related accidents in different societies (4). Burn is one of the important causes of injury in Iran and it is responsible for 6 percent of deaths in Iran, among all deaths caused by accidents (5). Based on statistics of the 2006 country report of recorded accidents by the office of accident prevention of disease management of Iran Ministry of Health, burn consists 5% of all accidents recorded in the country by the number of 56364 persons and are one of the important causes of injury in Iran by the incidence of 1 in 1000 people (5). Also, it is responsible for 6 percent of deaths in Iran, among all deaths caused by accidents (5). Burn has always been notable as one of the most costly diseases and its financial burden on patients, their family, and the economy of the countries (6,7). Other than the expenses of burn for the patients and the health system, burn is an irreparable event and has many physical mental, and social complications; but in half of the cases, this event and its complications are preventable (7,8). More than 95% percent of deaths from burns have occurred in low to moderate-income countries. In Iran, burn is the 13th cause of morbidity in diseases by more than 200 thousand life years annually (9). Considering that many deaths occur due to burns and survived patients may also suffer from burn complications until the end of life, such as vision complications, beauty problems, and defects in various organs; it is necessary to identify the factors that contribute to increased mortality and morbidity among burn patients. However, in Rasht city, such data has not been investigated properly, and the results of this study can be effective in policies for the treatment and prevention of burns. So, in this study, we aimed at evaluating the factors affecting the death of patients attending the Burn ward of Velayat Hospital in Rasht in 2019-2020.
Material and methods
This study was a cross-sectional retrospective review of medical records of burn patients in Velayat Burn Hospital of Rasht from March 2019 to 2020. Data were obtained by reviewing the hospital documents of patients attending with the diagnosis of burn. The records were surveyed regarding the possible factors affecting death.
Inclusion criteria were patients with burn, getting admitted from the emergency room to burn wards of Velayat Burn Hospital of Rasht (men, women, pediatrics, Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) ). Burn after trauma, incompleteness of documents, and inaccessibility to the documents were the exclusion criteria.
Data collection:
Data gathering was done by the checklist and all the variables including age, gender, body percentage of burn (based on the Wallace Rule-of-Nines), area of the burn, length of hospital stay, external factors leading to burn and also burns caused by self-immolation, underlying disease, cardiac rhythm disturbance, vital sign disturbance, cause of death, electrolytes disturbance and other blood laboratory variables such as complete blood count (CBC), level of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and glucose were obtained from the patients' documents and were recorded in the designed checklist.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were entered in SPSS version 26. For the description of the quantitative data, average and standard deviation and for the qualitative data, numbers and percentages were used. For the comparison between two groups of deceased and rescued, an independent t-test was used in quantitative variables and chi-square in qualitative ones. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Total number of 557 records were surveyed in this study. Demographic and clinical information of the patient is included in table 1. The average age of patients was 31±4.6 years. 326 patients (58.5%) were women and 231 patients (14.5%) were men. The Independent t-test did not show a significant age difference between men and women (p>0.05). Most of the burns were caused by the flame which consisted of 49.4% (N=275) of total burns. Most of the burns occurred in winter and after that respectively in summer, autumn and spring (table 1).
Upper limb burn was reported in 59.5% (N=332) of patients, 49.1% (N=274) had lower limb, 36.7% (N=205) had head and face, 50.7% (N=283) had trunk, 13.1% (N=73) had genitalia and 7.5% (N=42) had whole body burns. Therefore, the most areas of burn are respectively the upper limb, trunk, lower limb, head and face, genitalia and whole body (Table 2). The average percentage of burn in patients was 23.41±19.17 %. In terms of the degree of burn, the most common type was the 2nd and 3rd degree together after that, 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree respectively. The length of hospital stay with respect to the prevalence was 5 to 10 days, 1 to 5 days, 10 to 15 days and more than 15 days. The average blood glucose, arterial blood gas, and BUN are shown in table 1.
Inhalation burn injury was seen in 40 patients (7.2%) and self-immolation was reported in 23 (4.12%) patients. In the case of place of burn 459 patients were at home, 61 at work and 37 patients in other places. More than half of the patients had some kind of underlying diseases such as hypertension (n=73), neuropsychiatric disorders (n=41), cardiovascular diseases(n=31), diabetes (n=69), pulmonary diseases (n=17) and gastrointestinal disorders (n=36) and etc. Out of 23 patients with self-immolation burns, 16 had an underlying neurological and mental illness; Mental illness was statistically related to self-immolation (P<0.001).
Mortality risk assessment:
Of all the patients, 47 (8.43%) were expired and 510 (91.75%) were rescued. Chi-square had shown a significant relationship between self-immolation and underlying neuropsychiatric disorder (p=0.04). The most common cause of death in patients was a septic shock (45%). After that, multi organ failure (31%) and respiratory failure (24%) were the causes of death. One case of death also occurred in the prehospital emergency setting.
In comparison to patients who died and were rescued (table 2), Chi-square analysis showed a significant difference in the cause of burn type and length of hospital stay (p<0.001). In rescued patients boiling burn and in expired patients fire was the most important cause of burn. Also, the length of hospital stay in rescued patients was significantly higher in comparison to expired patients.
The average percentage of burn in rescued patients was 44.68% and 66.25% in expired patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.31).
Data survey by independent t-test showed that in biochemical variables, lower pH (p=0.00) and higher BUN (p=0.04) were related to death, but no significant difference was seen in serum creatinine of rescued patients in comparison to expired patients (p=0.41).
Discussion:
Burn is one of the most destructive injuries and is one of the major concerns of global public health (10). More than 300,000 people die of burn annually and millions of people suffer from handicaps and social, mental and economic disabilities of burn (11, 12). Mortality rate of burn is variable in different age groups. For example, burn caused by fire is the 6th important cause of mortality in 5 to 14 year old people in low income countries (13). Even though the average age of patients in the study of Abdulwahab (14) and Kadri SS (15) was 16.5 and 52.9 ± 18.1 years respectively, our findings were more consistent with the results of Chorlip (16) the average age was 35.6 ± 15.72. In our study, the average age of patients was 31 ± 4.6 years. It seems that this age group which is the most active age group and considered the community's workforce is more exposed to burn. Therefore, immunity in the work place in order to lower the burn related to different occupations could be an effective approach to lowering the burn injuries in this age group and could be important from an economic point of view. In the study of Sharma et al., 46% of burn patients were male and 54% were female (17). Tabiee et al. in 2004 in Birjand surveyed the epidemiology of burn in attended hospital burn ward as a descriptive cross-sectional study (18). The document of 342 patients was surveyed. The results of that study suggested that of total burn injured patients attending the emergency ward, 55.6% were men. In our study, 231 patients (58.5%) were women and 326 patients (41.5%) were men. In study by Amani et al. (19) in 2014, explosion and boiling water were introduced as the most common causes of burn. Statistical analysis of the study of Sharma et al. (17) suggested that burn with boiling water is an important risk factor for mortality. In the study of Kabirzadeh et al. (20), the most common external factor leading to burn (57.9%) fueled such as oil, petrol and gasoline. Ibrahimian (21) suggested that most patients (32%) were in the age group zero to 9 years old and among them, 20.7% were burned by hot liquids and 52.1% by flaming oil and petrol. Moreover Berry et al. (22) suggested in their study that burning with flammable liquid was effective in mortality. In our study, burning with flame (275 patients (49.4%)) and hot liquids (184 patients (33.1%)) consisted of the most common causes of burn. Hence, necessary education of parents and children should be conducted about burning with boiling water which could be due to overthrow of kettle, samovar and pot. Possibly, increasing the safety standards in gas burning devices by production companies and on the other hand, increased precaution of consumers could be effective in reducing the mortality from explosions. In the study of Bhansali et al. (23) in India, it was reported that whole-body burn had a significant relationship with mortality (p=0.000). Also Tarim et al. (24) 2013 studied the factors influencing the mortality in burn patients attending an intrusive care unit and suggested that whole body burn was more common in expired patients (25). Yen et al. suggested in their study that patients with whole body burns and inhalation burn injury have a higher risk of mortality (26). Study by Kasenda et al. in 2018 suggested that higher surfaces of burn and burn with boiling water are consistent with higher mortality (27). In the current study, the most common areas of burn in patients were respectively upper limb, trunk, and lower limb. Head and face, genital area and whole body; in rescued patients hot liquids and in expired patients fire was the most common cause of burn. Study by Bhansali et al. (23) suggested that the average length of hospital stay in burn patients was 5 days and there was a significant relationship between whole body burn and duration of hospital stay (p<0.001). The study of Kasenda suggested that the higher duration of hospital stay was correlated with higher mortality (27). By assessing the electronic documents of burn patients, Cheung et al. suggested that duration of hospital stay was an effective factor in predicting mortality (28). De Macedo et al. (1) suggested that lower hospital stay was consistent with lower mortality. In the current study, the duration of hospital stay was 5 to 10 days, 1 to 5 days, 10 to 15 days and more than 15 days with respect to prevalence. William et al. (29) 2019 conducted a study on mortality of burn patients and reported that having diabetes, pulmonary disease and cardiovascular diseases were related to higher mortality rates. In the current study, expired patients were diagnosed with neuropsychiatric diseases, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disorders, stroke and cancer. Also, a significant relationship was found between self-immolation and neuropsychiatric diseases. Bolemsma et al. (30) reported in their study that the most common cause of death was multi-organ failure (64.9%) and septic shock (45.9%). In our study, the most common cause of death was respiratory failure and after that cardiac arrest, bradycardia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hypotension. It can be stated that with the underlying disease, the resistance of the body is reduced, and the mortality was increased.
Conclusion:
According to the results of the current study, the most common cause of mortality was flame and the most common area of the burn was upper limb. Most burns occurred in winter and a significant relationship was found between self-immolation and neuropsychiatric disorders. The most common cause of mortality was respiratory arrest. Lower pH and higher BUN had a signification relationship with mortality. Therefore, focusing on burn by hot liquids should be a priority in any of the mentioned high-risk groups and prevention of burn and education on true usage of incendiary and hot devices and safety precautions, should be noted more than ever.
References
, Santos JB. Predictive factors of mortality in burn patients. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2007;49(6):365-70.
2. Peck M, Pressman MA. The correlation between burn mortality rates from fire and flame and economic status of countries. Burns. 2013;39(6):1054-9.
3. Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Organization WH. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020: summary: World Health Organization; 1996
4. Tabiee S, Nakhaee M. Epidemiology of burn patients in Emam Reza Hospital, Birjand, 1998–2002. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. 2004;6.
5. Vasee N, Badoohi N, Molavi M, Jahangiri K, Babaee A. to determine LA50 in Shahid Motahari burn hospital, Tehran, Iran. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2009;8(3):297-301.
6. Association AB. Burn incidence and treatment in the United States: 2011 fact sheet. Chicago: American Burn Association. 2011.
7. Rouzbahani R, Zamani A, Omranifard M, Rouzbahani A, FaragZadegan Z, Rezaei F. An epidemiological study on Burned patients admitted to Imam Mousa Kazem hospital, Isfahan, 2003-2004. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. 2005;7.
8. Rafiei M, Memarzadeh M, HOSSEINPOUR M. Evaluation of burn epidemiology in children hospitalized in Esfahan province during the recent two years. 2007.
9. Azizi AA, Zarei J, Nabovati E, Vakili-Arki H, Abbasi E, Razavi AR. Determining of the Factors Affecting Mortality in Burn Patients Using a Decision Tree Data Mining Algorithm. Journal of Management of Health (2018), 16 (54): pp 34-45.
10. Forjuoh SN. Burns in low-and middle-income countries: a review of available literature on descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Burns. 2006;32(5):529-37.
11. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Burns. 2011;37(7):1087-100.
12. Peck MD, Kruger GE, Van Der Merwe AE, Godakumbura W, Ahuja RB. Burns and fires from non-electric domestic appliances in low and middle income countries: Part I. The scope of the problem. Burns. 2008;34(3):303-11.
13. Peck MD. Epidemiology of burns throughout the World. Part II: intentional burns in adults. Burns. 2012;38(5):630-7.
14. Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP. A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;22(2):71-9.
15. Kadri SS, Miller AC, Hohmann S, Bonne S, Nielsen C, Wells C, et al. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in smoke inhalation-associated acute lung injury: data from 68 United States hospitals. Chest. 2016;150(6):1260-8.
16. Tan Chor Lip H, Tan JH, Thomas M, Imran F-H, Azmah Tuan Mat TN. Survival analysis and mortality predictors of hospitalized severe burn victims in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit. Burns & trauma. 2019;7:s41038-018-0140-1.
17. Sharma PN, Bang RL, Ghoneim IE, Bang S, Sharma P, Ebrahim MK. Predicting factors influencing the fatal outcome of burns in Kuwait. Burns. 2005;31(2):188-92.
18. tabiee S, nakhaee M. Epidemiology of burn patients in Emam Reza Hospital, Birjand, 1998–2002. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2004; 6 (1) :43-51. 4
19. . Amani L, Soleymanzadeh Moghadam S, Roudbari M, Roustapoor R, Armat M, Rastegar Lari A. Epidemiology and Mortality of burned patients referred to Motahari Hospital, Tehran. RJMS. 2015; 21 (127) :31-38.
20. . Kabirzadeh Az, Zamani Kiasari A, Bagherian Farahabadi A, Mohseni Saravi B, Kabirzadeh Agh, Tavasoli Ashrafi A. Burn death rate among hospitalized patients in Zare' teaching hospital of Mazandaran medical University, Sari, Iran (2002-04). J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2007; 9 (1) :79-82
21. Ebrahimian M. Causes of burning and its mortality rate in Shiraz. Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. 2000; 3 (4) :97-102.
22. Berry CC, Wachtel TL, Frank HA. An analysis of factors which predict mortality in hospitalized burn patients. Burns. 1982;9(1):38-45.
23. Bhansali CA, Gandhi G, Sahastrabudhe P, Panse N. Epidemiological study of burn injuries and its mortality risk factors in a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Burns. 2017;25(1):62.
24. Tarim A, Nursal TZ, Yildirim S, Noyan T, Moray G, Haberal M. Epidemiology of pediatric burn injuries in southern Turkey. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 2005;26(4):327-30.
25. Tarim MA. Factors affecting mortality in burn patients admitted to intensive care unit. Eastern Journal of Medicine. 2013;18(2):72.
26. Yen C-I, Chiou M-J, Kuo C-F, Liao H-T. Determination of risk factors for burn mortality based on a regional population study in Taiwan. Burns. 2018;44(6):1591-601.
27. Kasenda S, Mategula D, Manda GE, Chokotho TK. Risk Factors of Mortality of Hospitalised Adult Burn Patients a Malawian Tertiary Hospital Burns Unit. BioRxiv. 2018:421982.
28. Cheung M, Cobb AN, Kuo PC. Predicting burn patient mortality with electronic medical records. Surgery. 2018;164(4):839-47.
29. Williams FN, Strassle PD, Knowlin L, Napravnik S, van Duin D, Charles A, et al. Sex-based differences in inpatient burn mortality. World journal of surgery. 2019;43(12):3035-43.
30. Bloemsma G, Dokter J, Boxma H, Oen I. Mortality and causes of death in a burn centre. Burns. 2008;34(8):1103-7.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Updates in Emergency Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.